Advance care planning for dementia: a case study–Part 2

In Part 2 of this post about dementia, disability, and advance directives, Lamar Hankins challenges Dresser's assertion that an advance directive that calls for allowing a person to die in the later stages of dementia should be ignored in favor of her view of what care is appropriate.

Advance care planning for dementia: a case study–Part 1

Rebecca Dresser is a law professor and recognized expert in biomedical ethics. She argues that "people usually live for many years after a dementia diagnosis, years in which meaningful and satisfying life can continue. People can’t be sure how they will fare as dementia patients . . ."  She suggests that because dementia patients can adapt to their new circumstances, they must, therefore, be allowed to accept this new life.. Lamar Hankins analyses her ideas in a two-part post.

© 2026 | Final Exit Network™

The opinions expressed on this website in both the posts and the comments are the views of the signed authors and commenters, and do not necessarily reflect the views or positions of the Final Exit Network, its board, or volunteers.