NOTE: Posts and comments on The Good Death Society Blog are the views of the respective writers and do not necessarily reflect the views or positions of Final Exit Network, its board, or volunteers.

(Editor’s note: The following is by attorney Bill Simmons, lecturer on end-of-life choices. You can reach him through his website Final Exodus, or email to vermilionsim@gmail.com. — KTB)

Suicide to most of the English-speaking world is a loaded word connoting death by gun, jumping from high bridges, carbon monoxide poisoning and slashed wrists. For that reason, many in the right-to-die (RtD) movement, believe that an alternate term is needed for the kind of death we believe in.

As an outgrowth of the 2014 Chicago meeting of the World Federation of Right to Die Societies, I headed an ad hoc international working group to find an alternate. There were 17 in the group, including such notables as Rob Jonquiere from the World Federation and Dr. Rodney Syme from Australia. After working many months by email, the group could only come up with a euphemism, the well-known death with dignity. (For a copy of the group’s report, send me an email.)

I and others of the group (names scattered below) were not satisfied with the phrase and felt strongly that one word was needed. We came up with the word dignicide.

The word was proposed by Lenn Bernstein and researched by Hugh Wynn. It was apparently first used by an Englishman, Richard Stainton, in 2011. He said, “When the struggle becomes too much to bear, a stigma-free word like dignicide would give recognition to the conscious and courageous decision being taken and would lessen for loved ones the sense of failure suicide often prompts.” (The Guardian 24 Aug 2011).

Dignicide connotes death with dignity. Its detractors say it literally means death to dignity. Leaders in the RtD movement, particularly Faye Girsh and Derek Humphry, don’t like the word. As Derek has said, “call a spade a spade.” That is, as narrowly and legally defined, indeed self-deliverance is suicide!

I gave a presentation promoting the word at the Federation’s 2016 Amsterdam meeting. It fared no better.

Those of us promoting dignicide used Survey Monkey to see how it would be received by the general public in the English-speaking world. While some liked it, most respondents did not. No doubt there is negativity in “cide.” (For some specific pros and cons, read page 14 of FEN’s Fall 2019 magazine.)

In the intervening years, nothing better has turned up.

All the states that have adopted medical aid in dying (MAiD) emphatically say death under these laws is not suicide. Then, what is it? It is strange that laws say what something is not, but fail to say what it is. This creates a hole, a void. Filling the hole left by voiding suicide with multiple words does not seem to do it, but dignicide does seem to do it. Of course, the word also signifies a self-chosen death that does not fall within the confines of MAiD.

One of the group, Dan Carrigan, a leader in the RTD movement in North Carolina, promoted the word in his state. It was catching on there but got no traction elsewhere. Dan’s experience tells me that, with proper promotion, the word can catch on. When it does, in my opinion, it will become common usage.

Is anyone interesting in taking up the challenge with me? There are several approaches that could be pursued. Create a page in Wiktionary. Seek leaders in the RTD movement worldwide who like the term. Find RTD organizations that will get behind it. Get North Carolina going again. Try to change the minds of the RTD leaders who disfavor the word. Write newspaper opinion pieces. One of the best avenues might be to try to get a major news organization to use it, or even a minor one.

For those of you who would like to give this a try with me, please send me a note at my e-address below. If there is sufficient interest, I will form another ad hoc group to set an approach — and give dignicide a hard push this time.

Author Bill Simmons

More posts by Bill Simmons

Join the discussion 14 Comments

  • Mitch Wein says:

    The proper phrase should be: Self Exit. When we die, we really exit life. The word, “Dignicide” means “Dignified MURDER.” The “cide’ part connotes murder. Self Exit is simple: we, ourselves, exit life. Some of us believe that Christ did the same on the Cross and he only suffered for six hours. “Suicide” means “Self Murder.”

    • Kevin Bradley says:

      Mitch, “cide” actually means kill, not murder. The King James bible incorrectly translated thou shall not kill as thou shall not murder. In the original Hebrew, murder specifically meant “the taking of another’s life with malice.” Helping end the life of a loved one is not murder if no malice is involved and if the other person wants it (you cannot “take” something that is freely given, you can only receive it). Ending one’s own life is not murder because it’s not another’s life.

      • Mitch Wein says:

        You were right. I just saw this on the internet: “The –cide ending originates from the Latin word caedere meaning to kill …” Thus, suicide means “self kill.” I still prefer the term to be Self EXIT since I do not believe life ends at death. We simply exit our human bodies and return to Christ as an immortal being.

    • Trevor Wicks says:

      Planning for the end of life is a process, and this process should take months to complete. The end result is that the individual or a practitioner administers a substance that peacefully ends the persons life. This interaction should take between 15 minutes to one hour. Given that months of planning, arrangements and emotional resolutions, result in a timely dignified and pain free end of life; I suggest that new words or terminology should describe the process, not the last few minutes of a persons journey through life.

      ‘A Planned End of Life Arrangement’ APEOLA April 16th 2020
      Planning and implementing a dignified conclusion to a person’s life is a choice and fundamental right of that individual.
      Preparing for the end of life has to be well planned and should allow a minimum time for reconsideration.
      ‘A Planned End of Life Arrangement’ APEOLA consists of three stages.
      Initially a person motivated to use APEOLA, would document the circumstances and conditions which would initiate the process. Possible examples below:
      1. Failure to recognize close family and or spouse
      2. Living with extreme pain
      3. Be compelled to live in a total care facility
      4. Inclusive bowel or urinary incontinence
      5. Becoming completely dependent
      6. Loss of physical and sensory function, vision, hearing etc.
      7. Become violent or aggressive
      8. Heavily medicated to the point of non-comprehension
      9. Other criteria ……………………………………………………..
      Next detailed records of wishes and requirements including Will, Power of Attorney, Estate Plan and final arrangements would be completed.
      The third stage is overseen, and if necessary administered by an APEOLA clinician or practitioner.
      Read More https://www.innovationbc.com/icandicide–dignicide.html

      …Trevor Wicks …
      TRENTEC INNOVATIONS
      Web http://www.innovationbc.com
      Qualicum Beach B.C Canada
      Phone 250 738 0524
      E-mail trentec@shaw.ca

  • Bernie Klein says:

    Thank you for this article but I must say that I stand with Derek & Faye on this subject. A suicide by any other name is still a suicide. My 82 year old sister recently committed suicide and our family took on no feelings of shame and he obituary stated that she took her own life. She lived alone and her health had gotten to the point where her only choice was a nursing home or suicide. She choose the latter and me and my remaining family members respected her decision totally. Our only regret was that she lived in a state where MAID is not allowed.
    One last thought : “dignicide” sounds like a name for a generic drug or something similar. I mean no disrespect to you and your group and I thank you for your efforts on the subject.

  • Bill Simmons says:

    Yes, Trevor, planning for life IS a process. No doubt about it. But getting people to use new terminology is difficult. The new terms, to catch on, need to be utilitarian and contain meaning at the same time. Good luck with APEOLA. Dignicide seems to fail to convey a common meaning and so isn’t catching on. Bill Simmons http://www.finalexodus.org

  • The debate over this word has been going on for 40 years — without solution. If a person does not like ‘suicide’ there are plenty of euphemisms nowadays. I use the word or its euphemisms as and when the context is suitable.

  • I was on Simmons’s original committee and recommended something that is perhaps too long, but which I believe is appropriate: Dying with Dignity, Comfort, Control, and Companions.

  • Mystic Tuba says:

    I doubt that people will be herded into a choice of word not their own….I like Graduation because I see it that way. The closest I’ve seen here is self exit; which can be thought of in more than one way, but in my belief system it is the self that exits and the body is left behind. I plan to Graduate.

  • Mike Maddux says:

    I think that “final exit” is a very good term for voluntarily ending your life.

  • Gary M Wederspahn says:

    A dear linguist friend pointed out that, unlike French which has a academy to officially proscribe which words are acceptable, English has always been open to freely borrow, invent and modify words. That creates a diverse linguist ecosystem in which new words survive, thrive or die in a sort of Darwinian way. So efforts by well-intentioned people to “change the narrative” face huge challenges.

    In this regard, the euphemism “self deliverance”, which has had some traction, doesn’t seem so bad to me.

  • Karen Averitt says:

    Dignicide sounds as if it is a “politically correct” word trying to hide the truth. Sorry, this is a monumental challenge which will not be soon solved. FWIW, I am most peaceful with “final exit” which is coming up soon for me.

  • Steven Brondino says:

    How can I obtain a copy of the 2014 report (referred to in this blog post as 2014 Chicago meeting of the World Federation of Right to Die Societies)?

Leave a Reply